Independence and accountability in regulatory agencies: a stakeholder approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/rc.vi4.96

Keywords:

Regulatory agencies , independence, accountability, interest groups

Abstract

Since the 1990s, most national governments have been progressively incorporating new regulatory policies in different economic and social spheres, enshrining the renewed model of the «regulatory state». Regulatory agencies need high levels of independence and various accountability mechanisms to separate them from the spheres of political and private power. This article provides a theoretical-conceptual analysis that explains the importance of political independenceand accountability to civil society and other stakeholders, such as interest groups, in the various regulatory processes...

References

Apaydin, F. y Jordana, J. (2020). Varying power configurations and the accountability of independent regulatory agencies. International Review of Public Policy, 2(3), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.1458

Arras, S. y Beyers, J. (2020). Access to European Union agencies: usual suspects or balanced interest representation in open and closed consultations? Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(4), 836-855. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12991

Austen-Smith, D. y Wright, J. R. (1994). Counteractive lobbying. American Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111334

Baldwin, R., Cave, M. y Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C. y Leech, B. L. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Baumgartner, F. R. y Leech, B. L. (1998). Basic interests: the importance of groups in politics and in political science. Choice Reviews Online, 36(02). https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.36-1204

Bernhagen, P. (2007). The political power of business: structure and information in public policymaking. En Bernhagen, P., The political power of business: structure and information in public policymaking. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203932612

Beyers, J. y Arras, S. (2020). Who feeds information to regulators? Stakeholder diversity in European Union regulatory agency consultations. Journal of Public Policy, 40(4), 573-598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X19000126

Bianculli, A. C., Fernández-i-Marín, X. y Jordana, J. (2013). The world of regulatory agencies: institutional varieties and administrative traditions. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, July, 1-26.

Borrás, S., Koutalakis, C. y Wendler, F. (2007). European agencies and input legitimacy: EFSA, EMEA and EPO in the post-delegation phase. Journal of European Integration, 29(5), 583-600. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330701694899

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447-468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

Braithwaite, J. (2019). The regulatory state? En Goodin, R. E. (ed.), The Oxford hanbook of political science (pp. 104-131). https://doi.org/10.7312/calp94192-011

Caramani, D. (2020). Technocratic representation. En Cotta, M. y Russo, F. (eds), Research handbook on political representation (pp. 135-147). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elg.

Carpenter, D. (2014). Reputation and power: organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDE. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Chaqués-Bonafont, L. (2004). Redes de políticas públicas. Madrid: CIS, Siglo Veintiuno Editores.

Chaqués-Bonafont, L. (2020). Parliamentary lobbying. The Palgrave encyclopedia of interest groups. Lobbying and public affairs, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_49-1

Chaqués, L. (2020). Interet groups and political representation. En Cotta, M. y Russo, F. (eds.), Research hanbook on political representation (pp. 301-313). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781788977098

Chaqués-Bonafont, L. y Medina, I. (2021). The representation of business interests during the covid-19 pandemic in Spain. Revista Espanola de Ciencia Politica, 57, 21-44. https://doi.org/10.21308/recp.57.01

Dahl, R. A. (2006). A preface to democratic theory. Expanden edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Dubash, N. K. y Bronwen, M. (2013). The embedded regulatory state: between rules and deals. En Dubash, K. y Bronwen, M. (eds.), The rise of the regulatory state of the south: infraestructure and development in emerging economies (pp. 278-296). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Dür, A. y De Bièvre, D. (2007). The question of interest group influence. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X07000591

Fernández-i-Marín, X., Jordana, J. y Bianculli, A. C. (2015). Varieties of accountability mechanisms in regulatory agencies. En Bianculli, A. C., Fernández-i-Marín, X. y Jordana, J. (eds.), Accountabilitity and regulatory governance (pp. 23-50). London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349583

Fraussen, B., Albareda, A. y Braun, C. (2020). Conceptualizing consultation approaches: identifying combinations of consultation tools and analyzing their implications for stakeholder diversity. Policy Sciences, 53(3), 473-493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09382-3

Gilardi, F. (2002). Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory agencies: a comparative empirical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 873-893. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176022000046409

Gilardi, F. (2005). The formal independence of regulators: a comparison of 17 countries and 7 sectors. Swiss Political Science Review, 11(4), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2005.tb00374.x

Gonenc, R., Maher, M. E. y Nicoletti, G. (2000). The implementation and the effects of regulatory reform: past experience and current issues. SSRN. OECD Economics Department working paper No. 251. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.238213

Gregory, R. (2003). Accountability in modern government. En Peters, G. B. y Pierre, J. (eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 557-568). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315127705

Guardiancich, I. y Guidi, M. (2016). Formal independence of regulatory agencies and varieties of capitalism: a case of institutional complementarity? Regulation and Governance, 10(3), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12080

Guidi, M. (2015). The impact of independence on regulatory outcomes: the case of EU competition policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(6), 1195-1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12280

Hanretty, C. y Koop, C. (2012). Measuring the formal independence of regulatory agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 198-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.607357

Hanretty, C. y Koop, C. (2013). Shall the law set them free? The formal and actual independence of regulatory agencies. Regulation and Governance, 7(2), 195-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01156.x

Hooghe, L. y Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governace. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233-243.

Jordana, J. (2011). The institutional development of Latin American regulatory state. En Levi-Faur, D. (ed.), Handbook on the politics of regulation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2012.732989

Jordana, J., Bianculli, A. C. y Fernández-i-Marín, X. (2015). When accountability meets regulation. En Levi-Faur, D. (ed.), Accountabilitity and regulatory governance (pp. 1-22). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Jordana, J. y Levi-Faur, D. (2006). Toward a Latin American regulatory state? The diffusion of autonomous regulatory agencies across countries and sectors. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(4-6), 335-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690500437212

Juanatey, A. G., Jordana, J., Pérez-Durán, I. y Sancho-Royo, D. (2020). Independence, accountability and responsibilities of quality assurance agencies in higher education: European and Latin American countries compared. European Journal of Higher Education, 0(0), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1850309

Koop, C. (2014). Theorizing and explaining voluntary accountability. Public Administration, 92(3), 565-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12058

Koop, C. y College, L. (2014). Delegation to independent regulatory agencies: mapping the provisions for mandatory accountability. West European Politics, 25, 125-147.

Levi-Faur, D. (2003). The politics of liberalisation: privatisation and regulation-for-competition in Europe’s and Latin America’s telecoms and electricity industries. European Journal of Political Research, 42(5), 705-740. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00101

Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(March), 12-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272371

Lewis, L. W. (2011). Regulatory capture: risks and solutions. En Estache, A. (ed.), Emerging issues in competition, collusion, and regulation of network industries (pp. 147-169). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Maggetti, M. (2007). De facto independence after delegation: a fuzzy-set analysis. Regulation & Governance, 1(4), 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00023.x

Maggetti, M. y Papadopoulos, Y. (2016). The principal-agent framework and independent regulatory agencies. Political Studies Review, 16(3), 172-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916664359

Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031

Majone, G. (1996). Temporal consistency and policy credibility: why democracies need non-majoritarian institutions. EUI Working Paper RSC, 96/57, 1-14.

Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x00003524

Majone, G. (1999). The regulatory state and its legitimacy problems. West European Politics, 22(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389908425284

Marsh, D. y Lewis, C. (2014). The political power of big business: a response to Bell and Hindmoor. New Political Economy, 19(4), 628-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.829435

Mulgan, R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: an ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555-573.

Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OCDE) (2017). Creando una cultura de independencia: guía práctica contra influencias indebidas. París: OCDE.

Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OCDE) (2020). Panorama de las administraciones públicas. América Latina y el Caribe 2020. París: OCDE. https://doi.org/10.1787/1256b68d-es

Pagliari, S. y Young, K. (2016). The interest ecology of financial regulation: interest group plurality in the design of financial regulatory policies. Socio-Economic Review, 14(2), 309-337. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwv024

Pavón-Mediano, A. (2020). Agencies’ formal independence and credible commitment in the Latin American regulatory state: a comparative analysis of 8 countries and 13 sectors. Regulation and Governance, 14(1), 102-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12187

Pérez-Durán, I. (2018). Interest group representation in the formal design of European Union agencies. Regulation and Governance, 12(2), 238-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12150

Querbach, T. y Arndt, C. (2017). Política regulatoria en América Latina: un análisis de la situación actual. OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers No. 7. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/politica-regulatoria-en-america-latina_940ec5c6-es

Rose, S. (2012). The regulatory state. En Rosenfeld, M. y Sajó, A. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative consitutional law (671-686). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Schillemans, T. (2008). Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: The horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0053-8

Skanavis, C., Koumouris, G. A. y Petreniti, V. (2005). Public participation mechanisms in environmental disasters. Environmental Management, 35(6), 821-837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0120-z

Thatcher, M. y Sweet, A. S. (2004). The politics of delegation. En Stone-Sweet, A. y Thatcher, M. (eds.), The politics of delegation. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203005989

Verschuere, B., Verhoest, K., Meyers, F. y Peters, B. G. (2006). Accountability and accountability arrangements in public agencies. En Christensen, T. y Lægreid, P. (eds.), Autonomy and regulation: coping with agencies in the modern state (pp. 268-298). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Vos, E. (2005). Independence, accountability and transparency of European regulatory agencies. En Geradin, D., Muñoz, R. y Petit, N. (eds.), Regulation through agencies: a new paradigm of European governance (pp. 120-137). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Wonka, A. y Rittberger, B. (2010). Credibility complexity and uncertainty explaining the institutional independence of 29 EU agencies. West European Politics, 33(4), 730-752. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140238100379459

Published

2024-10-18

How to Cite

Ayala González, Ángel A. (2024). Independence and accountability in regulatory agencies: a stakeholder approach. RC RENDICION DE CUENTAS, (4). https://doi.org/10.32870/rc.vi4.96